While millionaires and billionaires enjoyed another year of federal government handouts in excess of $100,000, I spent the better part of my day in a plasma donation clinic with dozens of others, all of us impatiently waiting to part with our lifeblood in exchange for $25.
This week marks the 10-year anniversary of the tax cut package signed into law in President Bush's first year of office. And while tax cuts were also parsed out to the American poor and middle class, the lion's share of the wealth has pooled into the hands of the richest 2 percent of Americans since Bush's "Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act" became the law of the land. The result of that legislation has been anything but a relief for the other 98 percent of us.
Today's Republicans and corporate Democrats continue to fall back on tax cuts as the panacea for the deficit and the jobs crisis. Yet, by the end of the decade that followed the Bush tax cuts, America had experienced zero net job creation and the widest income gap between the wealthiest and everyone else since the dawn of the Great Depression. Today, that disparity is even more widespread in America than in third-world countries like Ethiopia, Ivory Coast and Pakistan.
When President Clinton left office in January of 2001, he had balanced the budget, erased the deficit created by his predecessors and turned it into a towering surplus. The CBO had predicted budget surpluses in the trillions for the coming decade. The BLS had predicted average to faster-than-average job growth in nearly all sectors. All signs pointed to an economic surge that would benefit all of America, assuming we stayed on course.
But by January of 2011, Bush's tax cut package alone had accumulated $2.6 trillion in debt. Median weekly earnings were in decline while the richest .01 percent of taxpayers enjoyed an annual $520,000 handout from Uncle Sam. Rich brats living on trust funds reaped great benefits from the phasing out of the estate tax while nearly half of America's entrepreneurs saw their new businesses fail in less than five years. And as the most recent jobs report indicates, the last 10 years of tax cuts for the rich has had no effect on a dangerously high unemployment rate. The party that tells us all to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps has, for the last decade, enacted and supported policy that flies directly in the face of their stated philosophy. In reality, hardworking, taxpaying citizens are being told to sacrifice more of the public services we depend on so our leaders can shove even larger tax breaks to the wealthy.
Just $2.3 of that $2.6 trillion could modernize America's infrastructure in the next five years and put millions of Americans back to work. That money could have been spent on small business loans that would foster sustainable economic growth in American communities. Folks like me wouldn't have to resort to selling plasma for gas money if we invested those trillions in our communities, instead of on lavish tax cuts for billionaires.
George Santayana famously said, "Those who do not learn from history
are doomed to repeat it." If our leaders still haven't learned from the
last 10 years of failed tax policy, the road ahead will only become more
perilous for the American people.
Follow Carl Gibson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/usuncut
Rep. Charles Rangel: The Disastrous Legacy of the Bush Tax Cuts
|
JRPabcDC
A Dozen #House #Democrats Urge @BarackObama to End Bush-Era Tax Cuts for Rich - The Note http://t.co/04ZkQCq #debtlimit
21 hours ago from Tweet Button
|
||
| GuyKawasaki What a difference a decade makes: Effects of the Bush-era tax cuts http://is.gd/qqxc5D | ||
|
dailydish
How Bad Were Bush's Tax Cuts?: This bad: The Bush
tax cuts were followed by low GDP growth, negative median wag... http://bit.ly/jIbxJe
1 day ago from twitterfeed
|
||
|
GuyKawasaki
What a difference a decade makes: Effects of the Bush-era tax cuts http://is.gd/HcT1ej
1 day ago from Alltop Tweets
|
||
Warren Buffett: I 'Should Be Paying A Lot More In Taxes'
President Obama: FIGHT Bush tax cuts for millionaires! | Progressive Change Campaign Committee
Study: Bush Tax Cuts Cost More Than Twice As Much As Dems' Health-Care Bill | Crooks and Liars
Buffett Tells ABC Rich Americans Should Be Paying `a Lot' More in Taxes - Bloomberg
Bernie Sanders Filibuster: Senator Stalls Tax Cut Deal (LIVE VIDEO)
The White House: Let Bush's Tax Cuts to the Richest 2% of Americans to Expire
More Dems buck plan to let taxes increase for rich - Yahoo! News
Bush tax cuts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Five myths about the Bush tax cuts
The Bush Tax Cuts: Ten Years Later | Mother Jones
Bush tax cuts 101: What changes could be in store for taxpayers ...
Bush Tax Cuts News and Video - FOX News Topics - FOXNews.com
Share your Comment:
Annualized Growth Rates, Before and After TAX CUTS
Clinton
1993 to 1996 Real GDP = 3.44%
1993 to 1996 Real GDP per capita = 2.22%
1997 to 2000 Real GDP = 4.44%
1997 to 2000 Real GDP per capita = 3.26%
1993 to 2000 Real GDP = 4.01%
1993 to 2000 Real GDP per capita = 2.81%
Bush
2001 to 2004 Real GDP = 2.62%
2001 to 2004 Real GDP per capita = 1.68%
2005 to 2008 Real GDP = 1.75%
2005 to 2008 Real GDP per capita = 0.79%
2001 to 2008 Real GDP = 2.31%
2001 to 2008 Real GDP per capita = 1.36%
Much like Willi E Coyote when he runs off a cliff. Gravity has no effect on him until he looks down.
Conservati
The Bush tax cut package did not accumulate a $2.6 million dollar debt. Only spending money you don't have can cause that. An issue that is the responsibi
And if we have learned anything, it has to be that we can't tax only half the country and expect the other half to pick up the tab indefinite
I don't mind giving folks who are struggling a hand up, I just don't expect it to be a life-long responsibi
And I'm not even rich.
We don't have the money because of the "temporary
President Obama.
So this is now Obama's tax cut, not Bush's.
Why do the defenders of President Obama's unsuccessf
While I, too, would rather not pay for lifelong benefits, there are some in our society who will never be able to work. Some have severe health issues, some just don't have the cognitive abilities, and some just aren't people who you, or anyone else, would hire. What do you suggest we do with those people? Do we just let them die on the streets? (Oh, let me see. We're already doing that!)
Obama signed the tax extension in Dec, 2010.
And yet, the author never mentions it. Not like there's an agenda or anything, but do you have any idea what the debt is now?
Accumulate
And maybe I should of been more explicit with, "strugglin
A few points:
1) Letting people keep more of what they earned, isn’t a handout. That applies to the poor and rich alike.
2) Actually, the poor ending up paying a smaller percentage of tax and the rich a larger share following the Bush tax cuts. Also, Bush created a new low-income tax category and provided a host of new low-income goodies and he only reduced the capital gains tax rate, the main way the wealthy recognize income, by 25%, which pales in comparison to the 40% tax cut by Clinton. So, you may be angry at the wrong guy….not to mention that Clinton repealed Glass-Stea
3) The tax cuts did not reduce normalized tax revenue, which is 18.5% of GDP, where it has been since Kennedy, the other great friend of the rich, cut taxes in 1959. More importantl
Kai
THEN CAME GW..HIS TAX CUTS TO THE WEALTHIEST 2% SINCE THEN HAVE NOT TRICKLED DOWN TO US AND NO NEW JOBS CREATED...
Poor baby, let me get you a hanky.
I haven't heard of a contract between the government and the wealthy where any tax cuts they received was to be handed over to you. When it's quite apparent there is no demand.
It must be depressing to depend on some one else for support.
I'm sure you can find a liberal support group in your area where you can blame all of societies ills on the rich.
My dad the bigot used to do that. Except he used a specific race.
"This debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party’s embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don’t matter if they result from tax cuts."
"If there were such a thing as Chapter 11 for politician
"It is a measure of how far off base both parties are - but especially the Republican